US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 22,794
Pretel v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00061
Petitioner:
Francisco Valencia Pretel
Respondent:
FCI Texarkana Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Shelley v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00063
Petitioner:
Michael Clay Shelley
Respondent:
FCI Texarkana Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Garcia v. Director, TDCJ
as 6:2024cv00149
Petitioner:
Antonio Andres Garcia
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Lumpkin
as 6:2024cv00150
Petitioner:
Antoine Thomas
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Whitten v. The 71st District Harrison County Court, Texas
as 2:2024cv00276
Petitioner:
Landon Whitten
Defendant:
The 71st District Harrison County Court, Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Briggs v. Unknown Defendants
as 1:2024cv00146
Petitioner:
Damian Briggs
Respondent:
Unknown Defendant(s), Ms Hawkins, Cpt Trotman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00350
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Young v. Sam B. Hall Federal Building et al
as 2:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Travion Dondrell Young
Defendant:
Sam B. Hall Federal Building, Bradney Randall Smith, Cortne Maresse Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Senn v. Jefferson
as 5:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Senn
Defendant:
FNU Jefferson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Senn v. Mosbey et al
as 5:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Senn
Defendant:
FNU Mosbey, EB and FNU Deal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
