US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 22,472
Adams v. McLane
as 4:2023cv01059
Petitioner:
Darnell Iven Adams
Respondent:
Marsha McLane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Foster v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2023cv00600
Petitioner:
Kenneth Eugene Foster, Jr.
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stanley v. Collier
as 4:2023cv01062
Petitioner:
Demico Stanley
Defendant:
Executive Director Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia v. Unknown Staff et al
as 6:2023cv00585
Plaintiff:
Antonio A. Garcia
Defendant:
Unknown Staff and Director FNU Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jones, III v. Back et al
as 9:2023cv00221
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Jones, III
Defendant:
J. Back, J. Burleyson, Christopher A. Farrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kirkendoll v. Warden
as 5:2023cv00142
Petitioner:
Bobby B. Kirkendoll
Respondent:
FCI Texarkana Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Sosa v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2023cv00220
Petitioner:
Eddie R. Sosa
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daughtry v. USA
as 1:2023cv00430
Petitioner:
Kip William Daughtry
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Daughtry v. USA
as 1:2023cv00429
Petitioner:
Joseph Ellis Daughtry
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Frankenfield v. TDCJ et al
as 9:2023cv00217
Plaintiff:
Brian C Frankenfield
Respondent:
TDCJ, Securus and Warden Goodall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
