US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11,333
Smith v. TDCJ
as 2:2024cv01046
Defendant:
TDCJ
Plaintiff:
Prentis Earl Smith, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Francis v. Doe
as 6:2024cv00468
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
John Francis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lumley v. Lumpkin et al
as 9:2024cv00240
Defendant:
Mrs. Sgt. FNU Barlow, C.O. Mrs. De Mars, Bobby Lumpkin and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Lumley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spence v. Burns et al
as 1:2024cv00503
Defendant:
Robert D Burns, III, Wanda Diane Esner, Jimmy Joe Esner, Sr and others
Plaintiff:
James C Spence, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steptoe v. Chevalier et al
as 1:2024cv00500
Defendant:
Angela N. Chevalier, Ashanti R. Hall, Tina Tompkins and others
Plaintiff:
Monzelle L. Steptoe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steptoe v. Back et al
as 1:2024cv00501
Plaintiff:
Monzelle L. Steptoe
Defendant:
J. Back, Tina Tompkins and Latrista Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunlap v. Brooks et al
as 4:2024cv01092
Defendant:
Officer FNU Brooks, Officer FNU Santos and Cpl FNU Hawkins
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Dunlap
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steptoe v. Back et al
as 1:2024cv00499
Defendant:
J. Back, Latrista Brown and Eladios Gallegos, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Monzelle L. Steptoe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander v. Ronalds et al
as 9:2024cv00236
Respondent:
S.T.G., John M Johnson, Ivey Ronalds and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrie Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Houston v. Ewing et al
as 1:2024cv00492
Defendant:
Thomas Ewing, C.F. Hazelwood, T. Thompson and others
Plaintiff:
Reddie Houston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.