US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 23,009
Anderson v. Harrish
as 1:2024cv00290
Defendant:
FNU Harrish
Plaintiff:
Ronald Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Green v. IAH Detention Center Facilities Medical Department
as 9:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Terance Green
Defendant:
IAH Detention Center Facilities Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrett v. IAH Detention Center Facilities Medical Department
as 9:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Derald Garrett
Defendant:
IAH Detention Center Facilities Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McReid v. IAH Detention Center Facilities Medical Department
as 9:2024cv00137
Defendant:
IAH Detention Center Facilities Medical Department
Plaintiff:
Mark V. McReid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Director
as 1:2024cv00288
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
James Michael Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oreye v. Warden, FCC Beaumont Low
as 1:2024cv00289
Petitioner:
James Oreye
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Beaumont Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
McGill v. USA
as 4:2024cv00647
Petitioner:
Iesha S. McGill
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00643
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Curley v. Nixon et al
as 5:2024cv00101
Defendant:
Stephanie McKinney, Nathan Jhonson, Tanedda Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Curley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rose v. Henderson County Jail
as 6:2024cv00254
Defendant:
Henderson County Jail
Plaintiff:
Harold L Rose, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
