US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 9,214
Adams v. McLane
as 4:2023cv01059
Petitioner:
Darnell Iven Adams
Respondent:
Marsha McLane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Foster v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2023cv00600
Petitioner:
Kenneth Eugene Foster, Jr.
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stanley v. Collier
as 4:2023cv01062
Petitioner:
Demico Stanley
Defendant:
Executive Director Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kirkendoll v. Warden
as 5:2023cv00142
Petitioner:
Bobby B. Kirkendoll
Respondent:
FCI Texarkana Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Sosa v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2023cv00220
Petitioner:
Eddie R. Sosa
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vigil v. Warden
as 5:2023cv00139
Petitioner:
Maikel Vigil
Respondent:
FCI Texarkana Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Palmer vs Director, TDCJ
as 6:2023cv00583
Petitioner:
Mark Wayne Palmer, Jr
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2023cv00584
Petitioner:
Ernest L. Brown
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chavez v. Warden FCI Beaumont Camp
as 1:2023cv00425
Petitioner:
Emilio Chavez, Jr
Respondent:
Warden FCI Beaumont Camp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bullock v. 184th District Court
as 6:2023cv00573
Petitioner:
Brian Bullock
Defendant:
184th District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
