US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 9,489
Fajardo-Macedo v. Warden, USP Atlanta
as 1:2024cv00407
Petitioner:
Abel Fajardo-Macedo
Respondent:
Warden, USP Atlanta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Fontenot v. USA
as 1:2024cv00402
Petitioner:
Michael Joseph Fontenot
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Caldwell v. USA
as 1:2024cv00403
Plaintiff:
Janson Caldwell
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Green v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2024cv00146
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Lowell DeQuincy Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Warden, Texarkana FCI
as 5:2024cv00147
Respondent:
Warden, Texarkana FCI
Petitioner:
Charles E Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Buckley v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00363
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Leon Buckley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oliver v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00366
Petitioner:
Willie T Oliver
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Prieto v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00362
Petitioner:
Manuel Prieto, II
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzalez-Uribe v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
as 1:2024cv00399
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
Petitioner:
Francisco Gonzalez-Uribe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Campbell v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00869
Petitioner:
Steven Bernard Campbell
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
