US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 23,009
Holmes v. State of Texas et al
as 1:2024cv00296
Defendant:
Renee Coward, Keith F Giblin, State of Texas and others
Plaintiff:
Marvin Gabriel Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Warden, FCI Three Rivers
as 1:2024cv00295
Petitioner:
Curtis Wayne Adams
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Three Rivers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Franklin v. Tidwell
as 5:2024cv00103
Defendant:
Judge John Tidwell
Plaintiff:
Marquis Franklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rhea v. Warden FPC-Bryan
as 1:2024cv00292
Petitioner:
Ashley Rhea
Respondent:
Warden FPC-Bryan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jones v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00293
Petitioner:
Frank Alonzo Jones, Jr
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Summers v. Warden, USP Beaumont
as 1:2024cv00294
Respondent:
Warden, USP Beaumont
Petitioner:
Michael S Summers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Mallard v. Womack et al
as 9:2024cv00138
Defendant:
FNU Night, FNU Baker, FNU Cruz and others
Plaintiff:
Chansler Depaul Mallard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Valle v. USA
as 9:2024cv00134
Petitioner:
Martin Valle
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Cavett v. Collier et al
as 6:2024cv00256
Defendant:
Ken Bruner, Maria J. McEvoy, Bryan Collier and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan Scott Cavett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Biggs v. Biggs
as 6:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Robert Jason Biggs
Defendant:
Danyale Lynn Biggs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
