US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 23,004
Johnson v. Peralta et al
as 9:2024cv00128
Defendant:
Lt. Netherton, Angelina County Jail and John Peralta
Plaintiff:
Isurika Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bradley v. Peralta et al
as 9:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Bradley
Defendant:
Angelina County Jail, John Peralta and Lt. Netherton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jeffries v. Hatch
as 4:2024cv00650
Plaintiff:
Jalen Jeffries
Defendant:
Detective Dustin Hatch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duke v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00250
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Timmy Lynn Duke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. USA
as 4:2024cv00632
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Nnenna Mary Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bracken v. Warden, FCI McDowell
as 1:2024cv00277
Petitioner:
John Fitzgerald Bracken
Respondent:
Warden, FCI McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Feist v. Director TDCJ
as 1:2024cv00278
Respondent:
Director TDCJ
Petitioner:
Herbert Feist
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grimes v. Collier et al
as 6:2024cv00245
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice and Executive Director Bryan Collier
Plaintiff:
John A Grimes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Easton v. Warden - FCI Beaumont Medium
as 1:2024cv00268
Petitioner:
Joseph Easton
Respondent:
Warden - FCI Beaumont Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Fernandez v. Warden-FCI Beaumont Low
as 1:2024cv00269
Respondent:
Warden-FCI Beaumont Low
Petitioner:
Leif Diaz Fernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
