Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 102,540
Ashlock v. Coke County Sheriff
as 5:2024cv00112
Petitioner:
Calvin Ashlock
Respondent:
Coke County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Saucedo v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2024cv00090
Petitioner:
Bobby Saucedo
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nunez v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2024cv00086
Petitioner:
Albino Nunez
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hancock v. Mr. Skinner et al
as 4:2024cv00385
Plaintiff:
Anthony Hancock
Defendant:
Doctor FNU Bahramri, FNU Mr. Skinner and Marg. Stevas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boswell v. Huntsville Parole et al
as 6:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
John A. Boswell
Defendant:
Huntsville Parole, Carmella Jones, Michael Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Laurel v. Warden S. Hijar
as 3:2024cv00153
Petitioner:
Daniel Laurel
Respondent:
Warden S. Hijar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dorado v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00154
Petitioner:
Carlos Dorado
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Carter v. USA
as 1:2024cv00063
Petitioner:
Dustin Ray Carter
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Modica v. USA
as 3:2024cv01073
Petitioner:
Jerrell Lee Modica
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Krikie v. State of Texas et al
as 3:2024cv01054
Petitioner:
David Paul Krikie
Respondent:
State of Texas and Dallas County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
