Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 102,502
Burleson v. District Attorney of Harris County, Texas
as 4:2024cv01539
Plaintiff:
LaDorthy Burleson
Defendant:
District Attorney of Harris County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frankenfield v. Goodall et al
as 3:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Brian C Frankenfield
Defendant:
TDCJ Parole Division, Kenisha Turner and Gail Singleton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelley v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00063
Petitioner:
Michael Clay Shelley
Respondent:
FCI Texarkana Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Pretel v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00061
Petitioner:
Francisco Valencia Pretel
Respondent:
FCI Texarkana Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Najera v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
Christopher Najera
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Morris v. Lumpkin et al
as 4:2024cv01506
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Morris
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin and David Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boswell v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 4:2024cv01507
Plaintiff:
John A Boswell
Defendant:
TDC Region 1, Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles and Carmella Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01516
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Thomas v. Lumpkin
as 6:2024cv00150
Petitioner:
Antoine Thomas
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2024cv01545
Plaintiff:
Nicholas David Mosquera
Defendant:
Brian Collier, Brett Ligon, Law Librarian Lovelady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
