US District Court for the Western District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 19,610
Tunstall v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00495
Petitioner:
Matthew Nelson Tunstall
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00491
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00492
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Bailey v. Albright
as 6:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Markiesha (Mark) Bailey
Defendant:
Judge Alan D. Albright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lester v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00470
Petitioner:
Timmy Heath Lester
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey v. Paxton
as 6:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Markiesha (Mark) Bailey
Defendant:
Ken Paxton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kindred v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 6:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
Herman Kindred
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID, Erik K. White, The State of Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tryon v. Bell County Law Enforcement Center
as 6:2024cv00238
Plaintiff:
Eric De'Monee Tryon
Defendant:
Bell County Law Enforcement Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elizondo v. State Judge of the 38th District Court et al
as 2:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Jaime Elizondo
Defendant:
State Judge of the 38th District Court and District Attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Laurel v. Warden S. Hijar
as 3:2024cv00153
Petitioner:
Daniel Laurel
Respondent:
Warden S. Hijar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
