US District Court for the Northern District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 32,771
Leal v. 371st District Court of Tarrant County, Texas
as 4:2024cv00372
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Leal
Respondent:
371st District Court of Tarrant County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vidal v. King et al
as 3:2024cv01015
Petitioner:
Tommy Ray Vidal
Respondent:
Adam King and Leslie Rachael Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Verduzco-Vega v. USA
as 2:2024cv00084
Petitioner:
Federico Verduzco-Vega
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Jolley v. Kemp
as 2:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Steven Jolley
Defendant:
Jesse Kemp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibson v. Terry County Sheriff
as 5:2024cv00104
Petitioner:
Charles Ray Gibson, Jr.
Respondent:
Terry County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Molina v. Eastridge et al
as 7:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
Herrado Jose Molina
Defendant:
Joseph Eastridge, Ms. Shannon Jones, Arturo Aguitera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mosley v. Jennings et al
as 5:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Walter Mosley
Defendant:
Debra Jennings, Christi Greenwalt, John Clum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCoy v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv00985
Petitioner:
James McCoy
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gill v. Wescott et al
as 2:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Michael Todd Gill
Defendant:
NFN Wescott, NFN Mendoza and NFN Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Felix Fernando Gonzalez
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
