U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 14,384
Valentinis v. Montgomery County Jail
as 3:2025cv00978
Petitioner:
James Valentinis
Respondent:
Montgomery County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Graham v. State of Texas
as 3:2025cv00964
Petitioner:
Gene Graham
Respondent:
State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sutherland v. Warden of FCI Butner
as 3:2025cv00971
Petitioner:
Joshua Sutherland
Respondent:
Warden of FCI Butner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Fleming v. Rule
as 4:2025cv00409
Petitioner:
Rhonda Fleming
Respondent:
Warden T. Rule, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Davis v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2025cv00927
Petitioner:
Benjamin Everist Davis
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2025cv00057
Petitioner:
Tracy Sabrina Johnson
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wiley v. State of Texas et al
as 3:2025cv00922
Petitioner:
Andre James Wiley and Christopher Lee Wiley
Respondent:
State of Texas, Hector Garza, Taylor Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Banos v. Director, TDCJ
as 3:2025cv00926
Petitioner:
John W Banos
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hendrix v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2025cv00081
Petitioner:
Jermaine Hendrix
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cavazos v. Warden
as 3:2025cv00891
Petitioner:
Jorge Adalberto Cavazos
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
