US District Court for the Northern District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 13,714
Bennett v. Unnamed Defendant
as 4:2023cv00971
Petitioner:
Crystal Bennett
Respondent:
Unnamed Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Davis v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv02124
Petitioner:
Kendoul Davis
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Salazar v. LNU 5:23-CV-221
as 5:2023cv00221
Petitioner:
Ryan C. Salazar
Respondent:
FNU LNU 5:23-CV-221
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Mason v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2023cv02102
Plaintiff:
Deondray Raymond Mason
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzalez v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2023cv02100
Petitioner:
Jose Gonzalez
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alexander v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2023cv02103
Petitioner:
Kieron Alexander
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Johnson v. Lubbock District Parole Office et al
as 5:2023cv00218
Petitioner:
Kenneth D Johnson, Sr
Respondent:
Lubbock District Parole Office and Shelby Silvas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jefferson v. Waybourn
as 4:2023cv00953
Petitioner:
Duane Delante Jefferson
Respondent:
Duane Jefferson, The State of Texas and Sheriff Bill Waybourn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hernandez v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00954
Petitioner:
Angel Hernandez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Salazar v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2023cv00217
Petitioner:
Raymond T. Salazar
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
