US District Court for the Northern District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 13,956
Hampton v. State of Texas et al
as 3:2024cv00900
Petitioner:
Donavon Hampton
Respondent:
State of Texas and TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Thornton v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv00902
Petitioner:
Shedrick Thornton
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Camacho v. Warden of FMC Fort Worth
as 4:2024cv00310
Petitioner:
Francisco Puga Camacho
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Garrison v. No Named Respondent
as 3:2024cv00816
Petitioner:
Joe L Garrison
Respondent:
No named respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McKellop v. FMC Fort Worth
as 4:2024cv00307
Petitioner:
Jeffrey McKellop
Respondent:
FMC Fort Worth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Garrison v. No Named Respondent
as 3:2024cv00805
Petitioner:
Joe L Garrison
Respondent:
No named respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cooper v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00306
Petitioner:
Jason Derrell Cooper
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lopez v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00021
Petitioner:
Alex Lopez, Jr.
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garrison v. No Named Respondent
as 2:2024cv00066
Petitioner:
Joe L Garrison
Respondent:
No named respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garrison v. No Named Respondent
as 3:2024cv00868
Petitioner:
Joe L Garrison
Respondent:
No named respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
