US District Court for the Northern District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 32,799
Little v. United States of America - B.O.P et al
as 1:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Randall Little
Defendant:
United States of America - B.O.P, C Stern, Dr. FNU Winger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mosquera v. Lovelady et al
as 1:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Nicholas David Mosquera
Defendant:
FNU Lovelady and FNU McGowen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joe v. LNU 3:24-CV-1071
as 3:2024cv01071
Plaintiff:
Demarcus Kenard Joe
Defendant:
FNU LNU 3:24-CV-1071
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vathis v. Brown
as 3:2024cv01030
Petitioner:
Christopher Marcus Vathis
Respondent:
Marion Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Leal v. Lumpkin, Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00372
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Leal
Respondent:
371st District Court of Tarrant County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barnes v. TDCJ
as 3:2024cv01038
Petitioner:
MonQuas Barnes
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ashlock v. Coke County et al
as 3:2024cv00959
Plaintiff:
Calvin Lee Ashlock
Defendant:
Coke County, Midland County and Tom Green County Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vidal v. King et al
as 3:2024cv01015
Petitioner:
Tommy Ray Vidal
Respondent:
Adam King and Leslie Rachael Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00996
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
McCoy v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv00985
Petitioner:
James McCoy
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
