District of New Jersey Court Cases
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 124,554
PUGH v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2018cv13958
Plaintiff:
MONIQUE PUGH
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision
ELFAR v. MERCADO et al
as 2:2018cv13951
Defendant:
ABC CO. 1-10 (FICTITIOUSLY NAMED), JOEY MERCADO, PACE MOTOR LINES, INC.
and others
Plaintiff:
RONALD N ELFAR
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Auto Negligence
HATCHER JR. v. ESPINOZA
as 1:2018cv13938
Respondent:
E. ESPINOZA
Petitioner:
ALBERT W. HATCHER JR.
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
J.C. v. RICHARDS et al
as 1:2018cv13947
Plaintiff:
J.C.
Defendant:
GENE RICHARDS, CHARLES GROVER, SGT. ROBERT WORRICK
and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
FRANCESKI v. FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION et al
as 1:2018cv13945
Defendant:
NYCB MORTGAGE COMPANY, LLC, FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
BARBARA FRANCESKI
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv13944
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
and others
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CO v. RUBIN et al
as 2:2018cv13948
Plaintiff:
JAMES ONG CO
Defendant:
TOYOTA LEASE TRUST, YAKOV RUBIN, T. ELI FEILER
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv13949
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Fair Debt Collection Act
CADLEROCK JOINT VENTURE, LP v. LEKIC et al
as 2:2018cv13941
Defendant:
AIDA LEKIC, MIRSAD LEKIC, THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Plaintiff:
CADLEROCK JOINT VENTURE, LP
Cause Of Action: Bank Foreclosure
RUSAL AMERICA CORP. v. WIND TURBINE AND ENERGY CABLES CORP. d/b/a WTEC
as 2:2018cv13934
Plaintiff:
RUSAL AMERICA CORP.
Defendant:
WIND TURBINE AND ENERGY CABLES CORP. d/b/a WTEC
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
