Sixth Circuit Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 783
Reineke v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company
as 2:2022cv10953
Plaintiff:
David Reineke
Defendant:
Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Viola v. Kasaris et al
as 1:2022cv00559
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Anthony Viola
3Rd Party Defendant:
Daniel Kasaris, Arvin Clar, Jay Milano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
McLeod v. Bryant et al
as 2:2022cv10729
Plaintiff:
John Michael McLeod
Defendant:
Michael Bryant and Internal Revenue Service
Singleteary v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv00216
Plaintiff:
Dylan L. Singleteary
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409 Postal Service
Lawson v. Warden, Noble Correctional Institution
as 3:2022cv00040
Plaintiff:
Thomas W. Lawson
Defendant:
Warden, Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Abbot v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00071
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA R. ABBOTT
Defendant:
NORFOLK & SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, INC. and Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Railway Labor Act
McKenzie v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company (JRG1)
as 1:2022cv00031
Plaintiff:
Stanley D McKenzie, Sr.
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Cook et al v. United States of America (TV1)
as 3:2022cv00034
Plaintiff:
Steven H Cook and Joni H Cook
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Griffith v. CSX Transportation Inc.
as 4:2022cv00017
Plaintiff:
Dustin R Griffith
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Janik v. CSX Transporation, Inc.
as 1:2021cv00781
Plaintiff:
Joseph G. Janik
Defendant:
CSX Transporation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
