District Court Cases in Ohio

Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 153,074
Jones v. Sullivan
as 3:2022cv02135
Petitioner: Dashay Jones
Respondent: Warden Dennis Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Deerfield AG Services, Inc. v. CompuWeigh Corporation
as 5:2022cv02136
Plaintiff: Deerfield AG Services, Inc.
Defendant: CompuWeigh Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Optinetix (Israel) Ltd. v. Giant Eagle, Inc.
as 5:2022cv02137
Plaintiff: Optinetix (Israel) Ltd.
Defendant: Giant Eagle, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Beaver v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 3:2022cv02138
Plaintiff: Kimberly Sue Beaver
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Doe v. Varsity Brands, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv02139
Plaintiff: John Doe
Defendant: Varsity Brands, LLC, Varsity Spirit, LLC, Varsity Brands Holding Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00692
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Wheeler v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2022cv04172
Plaintiff: Sonnie L. Wheeler
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Prows v. City of Oxford et al
as 1:2022cv00693
Plaintiff: Tate Prows
Defendant: City of Oxford, Chief John A. Jones, Michael Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cameron v. The Kroger Company
as 1:2022cv00694
Plaintiff: Mary Cathleen Cameron
Defendant: The Kroger Company
Taylor v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04173
Plaintiff: Larry Taylor
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?