Ohio Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,000
CLARK v. CITY OF COLUMBUS et al
as 2:2026cv01565
Defendant:
LAKISHA JEFFERSON, Keith Moore, Enoch White and others
Plaintiff:
April Clark, r
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01110
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01112
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Boyer v. Eichhorn et al
as 1:2026cv01113
Defendant:
Manager Opal Anderson, Tee Monney, Director Margie Weaver and others
Plaintiff:
Edna Boyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv02856
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv02852
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities
Glowka v. Preble County, Ohio et al
as 3:2026cv00400
Defendant:
John Does 1-10, Sarah Driver, Deputy Wilson, II and others
Plaintiff:
Adam M. Glowka
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01111
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Arrowhead Road Services, LLC v. Vendel et al
as 2:2026cv01563
Plaintiff:
Arrowhead Road Services, LLC
Defendant:
Chief Eric M Vendel and Director 4 Andrew Adgate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Doe et al. v. Husted et al.
as 4:2026cv02831
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe and John Doe
Defendant:
Jon Husted, City of Youngstown, Mahoning County Sheriff Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
