Ohio Torts - Property Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,246
Geter v. Pediatric Products, LLC
as 1:2026cv00655
Plaintiff:
John Geter
Defendant:
Pediatric Products, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Rogers v. PNC Bank, NA
as 1:2026oe00624
Plaintiff:
Mary C. Rogers
Defendant:
PNC Bank, NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Rogers v. PNC Bank National Association
as 1:2026cv00625
Plaintiff:
Mary C. Rogers
Defendant:
PNC Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Rogers v. PNC Bank, NA
as 1:2026cv00624
Plaintiff:
Mary C. Rogers
Defendant:
PNC Bank, NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Mesna, et al. v. U.S. Marshall Service
as 3:2026cv01365
Plaintiff:
Roger Mesna and Lisa Mesna
Defendant:
U.S. Marshall Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Pisula v. Arcadia Consumer Healthcare Inc.
as 1:2026cv00574
Plaintiff:
Joseph Pisula
Defendant:
Arcadia Consumer Healthcare Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Hobbs v. City of Euclid et al.
as 1:2026cv01248
Plaintiff:
Barbara J. Hobbs
Defendant:
City of Euclid, Euclid Police Department, Officer Christoper Frato and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gamble v. The City of Columbus
as 2:2026cv00654
Plaintiff:
Cameron Gamble
Defendant:
The City of Columbus, Sean Evans and Officer Ryder Mussier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Diamond State Insurance Company v. Curfman LLC et al
as 2:2026cv00610
Plaintiff:
Diamond State Insurance Company
Defendant:
Curfman LLC, Hanes Brothers LLC and Hanes Tile & Floors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Diamond State Insurance Company v. Curfman LLC et al
as 1:2026cv00487
Plaintiff:
Diamond State Insurance Company
Defendant:
Curfman LLC and Hanes Brothers LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
