Ohio Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 18,218
Sanders v. Mahlmeister
as 5:2024cv02169
Respondent:
Warden Michael Mahlmeister
Petitioner:
JC Devar Sanders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. The State Of Ohio
as 2:2024cv04267
Respondent:
Warden, Franklin County Corrections Center II
Petitioner:
DaQuan Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Almedom v. Warden Marion Correctional Institution
as 2:2024cv04268
Respondent:
Warden Marion Correctional Institution
Petitioner:
Sefe A. Almedom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Craig v. Stuff
as 3:2024cv02152
Respondent:
Warden Angela Stuff
Petitioner:
Harold Jason Craig
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tomlinson v. Warden FCI Elkton
as 4:2024cv02151
Respondent:
Warden FCI Elkton
Petitioner:
Mark Tomlinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Lovett v. Gobel et al
as 2:2024cv04256
Defendant:
Sgt. Gobel, C. Miller (M.H.), c/o R. Evans and others
Plaintiff:
Kelvin R. Lovett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haines v. Smith
as 1:2024cv02134
Petitioner:
Douglas J. Haines
Respondent:
Warden Shelbie Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cooper v. Cool
as 5:2024cv02142
Respondent:
Warden Bill Cool
Petitioner:
Larenta Javon Cooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cooper v. Rosengarten et al.
as 1:2024cv02133
Defendant:
Parole Officer Adam Rosengarten, Adult Parole Authority and David Miller
Plaintiff:
Anthony Rashad Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
