Ohio Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 18,280
Smith v. USA
as 5:2024cv02198
Petitioner:
Jamel A. Smith
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Gurley v. Velez
as 1:2024cv02203
Plaintiff:
Jerold Gurley
Defendant:
Carlos Velez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. State of Ohio
as 1:2024cv02201
Defendant:
State of Ohio
Plaintiff:
Anthony Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Warden et al.
as 3:2024cv02185
Plaintiff:
Robert Martin
Defendant:
Case Manager Riley, Director Smith and Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. USA
as 1:2024cv00728
Petitioner:
Raymond Andrew Williams
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Confere, III v. DeMartino
as 5:2024cv02184
Petitioner:
Dana Confere, III
Respondent:
Warden Michael DeMartino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Padilla-Torres v. Warden, London Correctional Institution
as 2:2024cv04274
Petitioner:
Omar E. Padilla-Torres
Respondent:
Warden, London Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Whitfield v. Warden, Toledo Correctional Institution
as 3:2024cv00330
Petitioner:
Caleb Whitfield
Respondent:
Warden, Toledo Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hoskin v. May
as 1:2024cv02186
Petitioner:
Sean T. Hoskin
Respondent:
Warden Harold May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Klopfer v. VA Hospital Veterins Adminastration
as 1:2024cv00726
Plaintiff:
James Klopfer
Defendant:
VA Hospital Veterins Adminastration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
