US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,562
Flinn v. Portage County, Ohio et al.
as 5:2024cv01492
Defendant:
Bryan Morgenstern, Maddison Knapp, Josh Orwick and others
Plaintiff:
Kieve Flinn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stubbs v. Henry et al.
as 1:2024cv01482
Defendant:
Pastor Givens, Warden Christopher Henry and Associate Warden O'Donnell
Plaintiff:
Theo Stubbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmonds v. USA
as 1:2024cv01460
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Ricky Simmonds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Miller v. Mackey
as 1:2024cv01461
Respondent:
Warden Misty Mackey
Petitioner:
Leelin J. Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Mahoning County Sheriff's Department et al.
as 4:2024cv01465
Defendant:
Mahoning County Sheriff's Department and John Does
Plaintiff:
Brandon Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Graham, III v. North East Ohio Correctional Center
as 4:2024cv01468
Defendant:
Richard Haywood Graham, III and North East Ohio Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
City of Rocky River v. Taylor et al.
as 1:2024cv01469
Cross-Defendant:
Kufner Towing, Inc.
Defendant:
Migel A. Taylor
Plaintiff:
City of Rocky River
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Norris v. Watson
as 3:2024cv01444
Respondent:
Warden Tom Watson
Petitioner:
Adam T. Norris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Conley v. Healy
as 5:2024cv01430
Petitioner:
Franklin D. Conley
Respondent:
Warden Ian M. Healy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Luster v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv01431
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Vernon M. Luster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
