Conley v. Healy
Franklin D. Conley |
Warden Ian M. Healy |
5:2024cv01430 |
August 22, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Sara Lioi |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Financial Transaction in the amount of $5.00 received from Franklin D. Conley. Receipt # 154238. Related document(s) #3 . (F,AW) |
Filing 3 Order: Pro se plaintiff Franklin D. Conley filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the above-captioned matter. He has not, however, tendered the required filing fee or filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, the petitioner shall either (1) pay the filing fee of $5.00, or (2) complete and file the application to proceed in forma pauperis attached to this Order. If petitioner elects to pay the filing fee, the check should be made payable to Clerk, U.S. District Court and clearly indicate the case number on the check. Failure to comply with this Order may result in dismissal of this action without further notice. Signed by Magistrate Judge James E. Grimes Jr. on 09/19/2024. (Attachments: #1 Financial Application)(M,MT) |
Copy of #3 Order mailed to Franklin D. Conley Oriana House, Inc. 1829 East 55th Street Cleveland, OH 44108. (M,MT) |
Filing 2 Address Change Notice filed by Franklin D. Conley. (W,Jo) |
Filing 1 Petition under 28 USC 2241 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a person in federal custody. Filing fee not paid, due. Filed by Franklin D. Conley. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Memorandum of Law in Support of Writ of Habeas Corpus, #3 Exhibit 1 - Documentation of Informal Resolution Attempt, #4 Exhibit 2 - Request for Administrative Remedy, #5 Exhibit 3 - Part B Response to Request for Administrative Remedy, #6 Exhibit 4 - Regional Administrative Remedy Appeal, #7 Exhibit 5 - Regional Administrative Appeal, #8 Exhibit 6 - Central Office Administrative Remedy Appeal, #9 Exhibit 7 - Part B Response to Administrative Remedy , #10 Exhibit 8 - FSA Recidivism Risk Assessment, #11 Exhibit 9 - FSA Time Credit Assessment, #12 Envelope) (R,AP) |
Copy of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) mailed to Franklin D. Conley, 56644-060, FCI Elkton, P.O. Box 10, Lisbon, OH 44432 on 8/22/2024. Related document(s) #1 . (R,AP) |
Chief District Judge Sara Lioi assigned to case. (R,AP) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge James E. Grimes, Jr. (R,AP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Conley v. Healy | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Franklin D. Conley | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Warden Ian M. Healy | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.