District Court Cases in Ohio
Cases 1 - 10 of 165,658
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Howell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Jason Howell
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Mitchell v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02012
Plaintiff:
Thomas Mitchell
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv02009
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
General Mills, Inc. v. Malone et al
as 1:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
General Mills, Inc.
Defendant:
Matthew W. Malone and TreeHouse Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Tirado v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02004
Plaintiff:
Raul E. Tirado
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02005
Plaintiff:
Vance Aaron Williams
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Elder v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01999
Plaintiff:
Phillip Elder
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Robison et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02001
Plaintiff:
Johnny P. Robison and Malinda Robison
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sizemore et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02002
Plaintiff:
Steven Perry Sizemore and Alyssa Sizemore
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
