Southern District of Ohio Cases

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 33,816
Workman et al v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv02157
Plaintiff: Lonnie Workman, Jr. , Lonnie Workman
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Personal Injury
Snider et al v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv02153
Plaintiff: Alma Snider , Larry Snider
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Personal Injury
Reeves v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv02154
Plaintiff: Pamela J. Reeves
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Personal Injury
Semelsberger v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv02155
Plaintiff: Katie A. Semelsberger
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Personal Injury
Eads v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv02156
Plaintiff: Steven Perry Eads
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Personal Injury
Whaley v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv02162
Plaintiff: Kenneth Paul Whaley
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Personal Injury
Mason v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv02158
Plaintiff: Ronald Mason, Jr.
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Personal Injury
Durst v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv02159
Plaintiff: Glenvor Durst
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Personal Injury
Folmer v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv02160
Plaintiff: Gwendolyn Folmer
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Personal Injury
Cade v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv02207
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Personal Injury
1 2 3 4 5 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.