US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,856
Clark v. Blueprint Investments, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv02054
Plaintiff:
April Clark
Defendant:
Blueprint Investments, LLC, Brysod Anderson, Aaron McDaniel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Chapman v. Davis et al
as 2:2024cv02051
Plaintiff:
Tasha Chapman
Defendant:
Justin Davis, Consultants to Government and Industry Incorporated, 4 Real Estate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01993
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Anderson v. Harrison
as 2:2024cv01951
Plaintiff:
Wilfred L. Anderson
Defendant:
Brenda Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ohm v. Dupree et al
as 2:2024cv01954
Plaintiff:
Stan Ohm
Defendant:
Randy H Dupree, Christopher J. Regan and Brett McRoberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
