Prisoner Petitions Cases

Death Penalty Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 3,400
Broadnax v. Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2015cv01758
Respondent: William Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner: James Garfield Broadnax
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Raymond Martinez v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-70017
Petitioner - Appellant: RAYMOND DELEON MARTINEZ
Respondent - Appellee: WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Honie v. Bigelow
as 2:2007cv00628
Petitioner: Taberon Dave Honie
Respondent: Scott Crowther
Cause Of Action: Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Fields v. White
as 7:2015cv00038
Petitioner: Samuel Fields
Respondent: Randy White
Cause Of Action: Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
William Morva v. David Zook
as 15-1
Petitioner - Appellant: WILLIAM CHARLES MORVA
Respondent - Appellee: KEITH DAVIS, Warden, Sussex I State Prison, DAVID ZOOK, Warden, Sussex I State Prison
Robert Peede v. Attorney General, State of FL, et al
as 15-12077
Petitioner - Appellant: ROBERT IRA PEEDE
Respondent - Appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
GUARDADO v. SECRETARY FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 4:2015cv00256
Petitioner: JESSE GUARDADO
Respondent: SECRETARY FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Batiste v. Stephens
as 4:2015cv01258
Petitioner: Teddrick Batiste
Respondent: William Stephens
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus(Death Penalty)
Jerome Henderson v. Norman Robinson
as 15-3490
Petitioner - Appellant: JEROME HENDERSON
Respondent - Appellee: NORMAN ROBINSON, Warden
Jones v. Trammell
as 15-6087
Petitioner - Appellant: JARED WILLIAM JONES
Respondent - Appellee: ANITA TRAMMELL, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
1 2 3 4 5 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.