Eleventh Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,009
Miller v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Osceola County)
as 6:2024cv01719
Petitioner:
Everett Miller
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Osceola County)
as 8:2024cv02168
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Everett Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bevel v. Secretary of the Florida Department of Corrections
as 3:2024cv00748
Respondent:
Secretary of the Florida Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Thomas Bevel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bohannon v. Raybon
as 1:2024cv00249
Petitioner:
Jerry Dwayne Bohannon
Respondent:
Terry Raybon
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Death Penalty)
Lindsay v. Raybon
as 4:2024cv00882
Respondent:
John Q. Hamm and Terry Raybon
Petitioner:
Stephon Lindsay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Largin v. Raybon
as 7:2024cv00860
Respondent:
Terry Raybon
Petitioner:
James Scott Largin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grayson v. Hamm et al(DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2024cv00376
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Steven T. Marshall, Terry Raybon and others
Plaintiff:
Carey Dale Grayson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Travis v. Hamm
as 1:2024cv00206
Respondent:
John Q. Hamm
Petitioner:
Wayne Holleman Travis
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Death Penalty)
Leonardo Franqui v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-11887
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Petitioner:
LEONARDO FRANQUI
Jamie Mills v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections
as 24-11661
Petitioner:
JAMIE MILLS
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
