Eleventh Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 145,539
SHORT v. WALTON COUNTY et al
as 3:2022cv19162
Plaintiff: STEVEN W SHORT
Defendant: WALTON COUNTY and WALTON COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pilgrim v. Moates et al
as 4:2022cv00223
Plaintiff: Jimmy Lee Pilgrim
Defendant: Sheriff Johnny Moates and Chairman Hal Floyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells v. Cox et al
as 7:2022cv01268
Plaintiff: David Donnell Wells
Defendant: Phyllis Cox and LaDon Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gillespie v. James et al
as 1:2022cv00128
Plaintiff: Robert David Gillespie, Sr.
Defendant: Miss Crystie James, Miss Saint, Lt. S. Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nurideen v. Philbin
as 1:2022cv00129
Petitioner: Saeed Nurideen
Respondent: Edward Philbin doing business as Warden
Not Classified By Court: Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morgan v. Warden, FCC Coleman-Low
as 5:2022cv00436
Petitioner: Robert Lewis Morgan
Respondent: Warden, FCC Coleman-Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Minton v. Officer Ritter et al
as 3:2022cv01267
Plaintiff: Jerry Durrant Minton
Defendant: Officer Ritter, Cprl Rodgers, Officer Woodard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRUTCHLEY v. CLIFTON et al
as 7:2022cv00103
Plaintiff: ADAM WADE CRUTCHLEY
Defendant: CAPTAIN CLIFTON and SHERIFF ASHLEY PAULK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tivalo v. Stone
as 3:2022cv00134
Petitioner: Tivalo Boubacar
Respondent: Stacey N. Stone
Smith v. Ward et al
as 3:2022cv00133
Plaintiff: William David Smith
Defendant: Timothy C. Ward, Warden Brian Chambers and Warden Antoine Caldwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?