Eleventh Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 154,162
Lynch v. Givens et al
as 2:2023cv01611
Plaintiff:
Ocie Lee Lynch
Defendant:
Warden G. Givens, Warden Vencini Smith and Warden Phyllis Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanback v. Evans et al
as 1:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
James Stanback
Defendant:
Officer Evans and Paul Burch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Keeton et al v. Ogletree et al
as 3:2023cv00685
Plaintiff:
Raymond Mitchell Keeton and Brian Henry Ritter
Defendant:
Sgt. Ogletree, Jay Jones, Officer Snipes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SANTILLAN v. WINGFIELD
as 5:2023cv00308
Petitioner:
JOE RAMON SANTILLAN
Respondent:
BARRY WINGFIELD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv24512
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv62264
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Taite v. Alabama State Department of Interior et al
as 1:2023cv24507
Plaintiff:
Marcus Taite and Washington, Drelijah J. Muhammad-Ali-El-Bey-Tey
Defendant:
Alabama State Department of Interior, Georgia State Department of Interior, Florida Sate Department of Interior and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Dorsey v. South Florida Evaluation and Treatment Center
as 1:2023cv24509
Plaintiff:
Sherman Dorsey
Defendant:
South Florida Evaluation and Treatment Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Dumond v. Rodrigues et al
as 1:2023cv24511
Plaintiff:
Daniel Dumond
Defendant:
L Rodrigues, John Doe No.1, John Doe No. 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv01402
Petitioner:
Stephan Leon Marshall
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
