Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,616
Binns v. Wilson et al
as 2:2026cv01258
Defendant:
Mrs. Epps, Detra Deese, William Blanton and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Binns
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Francisco v. Salisbury et al
as 1:2026cv00844
Defendant:
Lt Grandpre, Lt Weakly, C.O Lopez and others
Plaintiff:
Joel Francisco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Francisco v. Corry
as 1:2026cv00843
Defendant:
Lynne E. Corry
Plaintiff:
Joel Francisco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ahmed v. Murphy
as 3:2026cv01534
Defendant:
K. Murphy
Plaintiff:
Arjune Ahmed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole v. Keefe Group et al
as 3:2026cv01089
Defendant:
Sandridge Secure Treatment Center and Keefe Group
Plaintiff:
Freeman Lamont Cole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. Bowers
as 26-11032
Defendant:
Kara Gougler, In Her Official Capacity as the TCCO Director of Case Management Services and John David Bowers, Facility Administrator of the MTC Owned
Plaintiff:
Brien Mason
Dennis Strutton v. Donna Anderson, et al
as 26-3263
Defendant:
George Killian, Director of Treatment Services in his official capacity only and Donna Anderson, Chief Operating Officer in her official capacity only
Plaintiff:
Dennis W. Strutton
Smuda v. Smith et al
as 0:2026cv04688
Defendant:
James Gilbertson, James Alsdurf, Malcolm Whynott and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Allen Smuda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Horswell v. State of Minnesota
as 0:2026cv04686
Defendant:
State of Minnesota
Plaintiff:
Phillip Horswell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rayvon Boatman v. Florida Civil Commitment Center, et al
as 26-14048
Defendant:
CYNTHIA NOBLETT, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICE, COURTNEY CARNER-JONES and others
Plaintiff:
RAYVON BOATMAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
