District Court Cases in California
Cases 1 - 10 of 681,476
United States of America et al v. Contract Services Administration Trust Fund
as 2:2024cv05489
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
Gill et al v. Northstate Anesthesiology Partners Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00341
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
(HC) Mendez v. Warden
as 1:2025cv00716
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Valtierra v. Nissan North America, Inc.
as 1:2025at00483
Plaintiff:
Estela Valtierra
Defendant:
Nissan North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Sanchez et al v. Reedley Community Hospital dba Adventist Health Reedley et al
as 1:2025cv00719
Plaintiff:
Gabriela Sanchez and Pedro Villagomez Solis
Defendant:
Reedley Community Hospital Doing business as Adventist Health Reedley, Aaron Dominquez, M.D., Jonathan Mayer, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
McClendon v. Apria Healthcare LLC
as 2:2025at00763
Plaintiff:
Joyce McClendon
Defendant:
Apria Healthcare LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025at00764
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025at00762
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025at00485
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Pallan v. Triton Capital Lending LLC
as 2:2025cv01623
Plaintiff:
Amandeep Pallan
Defendant:
Triton Capital Lending LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
