District Court Cases in California
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv04321
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv02061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv02075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Bicek v. Kia America, Inc.
as 8:2026cv02068
Plaintiff:
Thomas Bicek
Defendant:
Kia America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv06053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
(PC)Cannavan v. The County of Ventura et al
as 1:2026cv06052
Plaintiff:
Patrick A. Cannavan
Defendant:
The County of Ventura, The People of the State of California, Ventura County Public Defenders Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gill et al v. General Motors LLC
as 2:2026cv02658
Plaintiff:
Kristin Marie Gill and Brenden M. Gill
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv06018
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(PC) Cannavan v. Newsom et al
as 1:2026cv06029
Plaintiff:
Patrick A. Cannavan
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, CDCR, Jeff Macomber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Cannavan v. Newsom et al
as 1:2026cv06033
Plaintiff:
Patrick A. Cannavan
Defendant:
Gov. Gavin Newsom, CDCR Division of Adult Services, Jeff Macomber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
