District Court Cases in Minnesota
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,000
Marsh v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2026cv04134
Plaintiff:
Charles Marsh
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Kern v. McArthur
as 0:2026cv04140
Plaintiff:
James Joseph Kern
Defendant:
Sergeant Lucas McArthur
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Soung v. Bisignano
as 0:2026cv04149
Plaintiff:
William Soung
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
United States v. $424,762.51 in U.S. Currency
as 0:2026cv04144
Plaintiff:
United States
Defendant:
$424,762.51 in U.S. Currency
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
Flores v. Smith et al
as 0:2026cv04146
Plaintiff:
Adam Flores
Defendant:
Marshall Smith, Terry Kneisel, Doug Latuseck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Continental Casualty Company v. H.B. Fuller Company
as 0:2026cv04156
Plaintiff:
Continental Casualty Company
Defendant:
H.B. Fuller Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe subscriber assigned IP address 73.5.169.76
as 0:2026cv04157
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 73.5.169.76
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Bernardo Lising et al v. Target Corporation
as 0:2026cv04142
Plaintiff:
Lissa Bernardo Lising and Carly Amundson
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Ivory v. MCF St. Cloud Medical et al
as 0:2026cv04147
Plaintiff:
Albert Darnell Ivory
Defendant:
MCF St. Cloud Medical and MCF St. Cloud Security Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anye v. International Falls Police Department Minnesota
as 0:2026cv04141
Plaintiff:
Jude Chi Anye
Defendant:
International Falls Police Department Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
