U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit Cases

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 72,223
Hudson Edget v. MS Department of Corrections, et al
as 17-60127
Plaintiff - Appellant: HUDSON LYNN EDGET
Defendant - Appellee: MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, for East Mississippi Correctional Facility, M.T.C., Management Training Corporation, SERGEANT PULLYUMS and others
Katherine Arias-Navarro, et al v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-60129
Petitioner: KATHERINE DANIELA ARIAS-NAVARRO, ASHLY DANIELA CANALES-ARIAS, ANGEL ANTHUAN CANALES-ARIAS
Respondent: JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Antonia Rivas-Rivera, et al v. Jefferson Sessions
as 17-60128
Petitioner: ANTONIA ELIZABETH RIVAS-RIVERA, DANIELA IZAMAR RIVAS-RIVERA
Respondent: JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Michael Bogan v. Timothy Fornash
as 17-10218
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHAEL BOGAN
Defendant - Appellee: TIMOTHY FORNASH, Police Officer
Gregory Claybon v. Dallas County Cr Dist Ct No. 1
as 17-10216
Petitioner - Appellant: GREGORY ALLEN CLAYBON
Respondent - Appellee: DALLAS COUNTY CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 1
In re: Oscar Armando
as 17-10217
Petitioner: In re: OSCAR ARMANDO, also known as Oscar Armando Sarrez, also known as Oscar Armando Mendoza, also known as Oscar Armando Escobar
John Blanton v. J. Curtis, et al
as 17-10225
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOHN BLANTON
Defendant - Appellee: J. T. CURTIS, Dallas Police Officer Individually, MATTHEW SMITH, Dallas Police Officer Individually, RICHARD MARTINEZ, Dallas Police Officer Individually and others
In re: Cassius Brown
as 17-10219
Movant: In re: CASSIUS JAMES BROWN
Gary Smith v. Andrew Palafox
as 17-50152
Plaintiff - Appellant: GARY CHARLES SMITH
Defendant - Appellee: ANDREW J. PALAFOX, Medical Doctor
USA v. Favian Mendoza
as 17-10221
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: FAVIAN ARREDONDO MENDOZA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?