Alabama Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 22,844
Battle v. Headley et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00585
Plaintiff:
Antonio Dentray Battle
Defendant:
Joseph Headley and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moss v. McClain
as 5:2024cv00584
Petitioner:
Scotty Dale Moss
Respondent:
Warden Antonio McClain and Attorney General State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hawthorne v. Kizer et al
as 5:2024cv00592
Plaintiff:
Arice Hawthorne
Defendant:
Debra Kizer, Blake Dean, Donna Pate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. King
as 2:2024cv00581
Plaintiff:
Jessica Kelly
Defendant:
Matthew King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Howard v. Powell et al
as 7:2024cv00565
Petitioner:
Gavin Howard
Respondent:
Jordan Powell and Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Young v. Bonner et al
as 2:2024cv00566
Plaintiff:
Cedric Orlando Young
Defendant:
Bonner, S Mitchell, Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oliver v. State of Alabama (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Michael Darnell Oliver
Defendant:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Trejo v. Fair et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00269
Plaintiff:
Alberto Trejo
Defendant:
K. Fair and Arnaldo Mercado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Buggs v. Leslie et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00270
Defendant:
Donna Leslie, Montgomery Area Mental Health Authority and Steve Marshall
Plaintiff:
Dynassus Buggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Phillips v. Governor Kay Ivey et al
as 1:2024cv00551
Plaintiff:
Matthew Sherman Phillips
Defendant:
Governor Kay Ivey, John Hamm, Steven Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
