District of Alabama Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 13,743
Henderson v. Bowen et al
as 1:2015cv00280
Plaintiff: Solomon L. Henderson
Defendant: Billy Bowen, David Martinez, Life Tech and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Knight v. Taggart (INMATE 2)
as 2:2015cv00361
Plaintiff: Reginald Earl Knight
Defendant: Officer Taggart
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Dunn (INMATE 3)
as 2:2015cv00362
Plaintiff: Jimmy Williams, Jr.
Defendant: Jefferson S. Dunn
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pruitt v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00360
Plaintiff: Maria Charlotte Pruitt
Defendant: Alabama Department of Corrections, Edward Ellington, C.O. Bradley
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Lampkin v. Billups et al
as 5:2015cv00861
Petitioner: Dwight Dion Lampkin
Respondent: Phyllis Billups, Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peak v. Thomas et al
as 2:2015cv00863
Plaintiff: Willie Peak, Jr
Defendant: Kim Thomas, Kilby Correctional Facility, Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Burts v. Alabama Department of Corrections, State of et al
as 2:2015cv00853
Petitioner: Tyrone Burts
Respondent: Alabama Department of Corrections, State of, Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Dixon et al
as 1:2015cv00273
Petitioner: James Douglas Lewis, Jr.
Respondent: Hallie Scott Dixon, Huey Hoss Mack
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Dianne (INMATE 2)
as 2:2015cv00350
Plaintiff: Jack A. Davis
Defendant: Nurse Dianne
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Steward
as 1:2015cv00276
Petitioner: Neil Robinson
Respondent: Cythain Steward
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
1 2 3 4 5 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.