District of Alabama Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 4,169
Williams v. Dunn (INMATE 3)
as 2:2015cv00362
Plaintiff: Jimmy Williams, Jr.
Defendant: Jefferson S. Dunn
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lampkin v. Billups et al
as 5:2015cv00861
Petitioner: Dwight Dion Lampkin
Respondent: Phyllis Billups, Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burts v. Alabama Department of Corrections, State of et al
as 2:2015cv00853
Petitioner: Tyrone Burts
Respondent: Alabama Department of Corrections, State of, Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Steward
as 1:2015cv00276
Petitioner: Neil Robinson
Respondent: Cythain Steward
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Dixon et al
as 1:2015cv00273
Petitioner: James Douglas Lewis, Jr.
Respondent: Hallie Scott Dixon, Huey Hoss Mack
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. McCollum et al
as 2:2015cv00845
Plaintiff: Demarkules Williams
Defendant: Hardy McCollum, Thomas M. Smith
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. State of Alabama et al
as 5:2015cv00847
Petitioner: John Baker
Respondent: State of Alabama, Madison County Alabama, Attorney General for the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Berry et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2015cv00343
Plaintiff: Zachary Bouvier Taylor
Defendant: Walter Berry, Sam Olens
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smiley et al
as 1:2015cv00261
Petitioner: Frederick Bernard Smiley
Respondent: Carter Davenport
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Poyner v. Thomas
as 1:2015cv00264
Petitioner: David Randall Poyner
Defendant: Willie Thomas
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
1 2 3 4 5 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.