District Court Cases in Alabama
Cases 1 - 10 of 87,382
Rawlins v. 3M Company Inc
as 2:2023cv00729
Plaintiff:
Steve Rawlins
Defendant:
3M Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00727
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. Atomic Johnnys Food LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00728
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Defendant:
Atomic Johnnys Food LLC doing business as Atomic Johnny's Burger Bar and Clint Austin
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0151 ta - Telecommunications Act of 1996
Bryant v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv08016
Petitioner:
Larry Leon Bryant
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Alanis v. Neely et al
as 7:2023cv00723
Petitioner:
Maria Isabel Alanis
Respondent:
Kimberly Neely and C Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Syling v. Neely
as 7:2023cv00725
Plaintiff:
Patricia Syling
Respondent:
Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Perez-Leal v. Neeley
as 7:2023cv00726
Petitioner:
Claudia Perez-Leal
Respondent:
K Neeley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Surles v. Bell
as 2:2023cv00724
Plaintiff:
Christopher Surles
Defendant:
Mr Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Wexford Health Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00722
Plaintiff:
Jason LaBruce Watson, Jr
Defendant:
Wexford Health Inc, Alabama Department of Corrections, Givens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Wells Fargo Bank
as 1:2023cv00206
Plaintiff:
Michael Thomas
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
