District Court Cases in Alabama

Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 90,877
James R. Daniels, Jr v. Davita Inc et al
as 2:2024cv01002
Plaintiff: James R. Daniels, Jr
Defendant: Davita Inc, Davita Kidney Care Contracting LLC and DaVita Accountable Care Solutions LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01003
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Donham v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 5:2024cv01004
Defendant: Life Insurance Company of North America
Plaintiff: Brad Donham
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
NextGear Capital, Inc v. Bailey et al
as 1:2024cv00253
Defendant: Krista L. Waters, Joshua Kenneth Bailey, Krista Lynn Waters and others
Plaintiff: NextGear Capital, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Berger v. Scully et al
as 1:2024cv00254
Defendant: Judge William E. Scully, Jr., Joel Rogers, Cameron Wayne Elkins and others
Plaintiff: Kenneth Berger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00252
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Gilmore v. USA
as 1:2024cv00258
Petitioner: Vanda Maurice Gilmore
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Holt v. Gray
as 1:2024cv00255
Defendant: J. Gray
Plaintiff: Tarrius Holt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Prim v. Webb
as 1:2024cv00256
Defendant: Quincy M. Prim and Nurse Webb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Saxon v. Mobile Metro Jail et al
as 1:2024cv00257
Defendant: Mobile Metro Jail and Chris Platt
Plaintiff: Richard D. Saxon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?