District Court Cases in Alabama

Cases filed
Cases 31 - 40 of 84,288
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00641
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Sims v. Butler
as 7:2022cv00637
Petitioner: Milton Powell Sims
Respondent: Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perrong v. Rhed Key Properties LLC et al
as 5:2022cv00631
Plaintiff: Andrew R. Perrong
Defendant: Rhed Key Properties LLC, Dodie Hagler and Nkemdirim Oti
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00633
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00632
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
Goodman et al v. Childersburg Housing Authority et al
as 1:2022cv00636
Plaintiff: Tyqun Goodman and Chasity Norwood
Defendant: Childersburg Housing Authority and Vincent Housing Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00634
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Van Daniel v. Mickey Inc et al
as 5:2022cv00635
Plaintiff: Roderick Van Daniel
Defendant: Mickey Inc, Mickey Summerford, Jonathan Edward McNatt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Sims v. Butler We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2022cv00673
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00195
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?