Alabama Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 17,969
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00794
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00791
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Coonrod v. S. et al
as 5:2024cv01685
Defendant:
Dr. Oladipo Kukoyi, Greg S. and Dr. Tricia Villanueva-Harris
Plaintiff:
William Coonrod
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00455
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Harrison v. Milford
as 3:2024cv00788
Defendant:
Myron C. Milford, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Janieka Harrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Prattville Pride et al v. Hunt et al
as 2:2024cv00786
Defendant:
City of Prattville, Alabama, Adam Hunt and Bill Gillespie, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Prattville Pride and Caryl Lawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00784
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Bennett v. City of Woodstock, AL, The et al
as 7:2024cv01681
Plaintiff:
Patrick Bennett
Defendant:
Lauren Jones, Zachary William Farlow, Bernard Boozer Downs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01678
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01679
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
