US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama Civil Rights Cases

Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,109
Berger v. Scully et al
as 1:2024cv00254
Defendant: Judge William E. Scully, Jr., Joel Rogers, Cameron Wayne Elkins and others
Plaintiff: Kenneth Berger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00252
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Molette v. Advanced Integration Technology LP
as 1:2024cv00248
Plaintiff: Douglas Molette
Defendant: Advanced Integration Technology LP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00244
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00229
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Ghee v. Alabama Power Company et al
as 2:2024cv00216
Plaintiff: Samual Ghee
Defendant: Alabama Power Company, Southern Company and The City of Valley Grande, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Latham v. Robinson
as 1:2024cv00213
Plaintiff: Lori A. Latham
Defendant: Brett Robinson
Hays v. Kallis Love Stuff
as 1:2024cv00214
Plaintiff: Valencia Hays
Defendant: Kallis Love Stuff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00211
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
22nd State Bank v. Berger et al
as 1:2024cv00208
Plaintiff: 22nd State Bank
Defendant: Kenneth Berger, K. Berger Construction, Inc., Direct Floors, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?