US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 801
Conner v. Costello et al
as 1:2024cv00373
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Alabama and Sean P. Costello
Plaintiff:
Daniel Dewayne Conner
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Mack et al v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00369
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Mack, Brian Russell, Renicia Reed and others
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Davis v. Riley et al
as 1:2024cv00364
Defendant:
Clinton B Riley, SGT Pierce and City of Daphne, AL
Plaintiff:
Joseph Davis, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Whitney
as 1:2024cv00360
Defendant:
David Whitney
Plaintiff:
Isaac Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Tarabein v. Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
as 1:2024cv00342
Plaintiff:
Rassan M. Tarabein
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mitchell v. State of Alabama
as 1:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
Virgil Mitchell
Defendant:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Attia v. Jackon et al
as 1:2024cv00336
Plaintiff:
Joel Barton Attia
Defendant:
David Jackon, Randy Neil and Chad Hutchinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Valet Auto Wash
as 1:2024cv00337
Defendant:
Valet Auto Wash
Plaintiff:
Robert W Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Mossow
as 1:2024cv00338
Plaintiff:
Robert W Johnson
Defendant:
Officer E Mossow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Green v. McDonald et al
as 2:2024cv00321
Defendant:
Marvin McDonald, Brian Harris and Sumter County, Alabama
Plaintiff:
Joy Kelly Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
