US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama Civil Rights Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 763
Williams v. AT&T
as 1:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Wendy M. Williams
Defendant:
AT&T
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Sylvester v. Rawlins
as 1:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Brandon Sylvester
Defendant:
Robert Rawlins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ryan v. State of Alabama
as 1:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Linker Christopher Ryan
Defendant:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sellers v. Leshan et al
as 1:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
John Sellers
Defendant:
Leslie Leshan and JPL Pasadena
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Berger v. Skully et al
as 1:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Berger
Defendant:
William E. Skully, Jr, J. Dean, Michele M. Thomason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones et al v. City of Mobile, Alabama et al
as 1:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Monica Jones, Jason Jones, Torin Robinson and others
Defendant:
The City of Mobile, Alabama and The Mobile Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Conner v. McNeal et al
as 1:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Daniel Dewayne Cooner
Defendant:
Kendrick McNeal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brouillette v. Sherman et al
as 1:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
John Michael Brouillette, Sr.
Defendant:
Michael D. Sherman, Alabama Court of Civil Appeals, Alabama Supreme Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
White v. Taylor et al
as 1:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Patricia White
Defendant:
Donald Taylor and Justin Wells
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Williams v. Nexstar Media Group et al
as 1:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Wendy M. Williams
Defendant:
Nexstar Media Group, Perry A. Sooks, Geoff Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
