US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 4,356
Harrison v. Milford
as 3:2024cv00788
Defendant:
Myron C. Milford, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Janieka Harrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Prattville Pride et al v. Hunt et al
as 2:2024cv00786
Defendant:
City of Prattville, Alabama, Adam Hunt and Bill Gillespie, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Prattville Pride and Caryl Lawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00784
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00783
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Lowe v. State of Alabama et al
as 2:2024cv00778
Plaintiff:
Phillippi Sultan Lowe
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Steven L. Reed and City of Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thompson v. Foundever
as 2:2024cv00771
Plaintiff:
Mikisa Thompson
Defendant:
Foundever
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McMillian v. Teel et al
as 2:2024cv00768
Plaintiff:
Marcus McMillian
Defendant:
Anita Spivey, Carlton Teel and Christopher J. Gallops
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00758
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00759
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Ray v. City of Andalusia Public Library et al
as 2:2024cv00748
Defendant:
City of Andalusia Public Library
Plaintiff:
Caryl Lee Ray
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
