US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama Civil Rights Cases

Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,967
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00682
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
O'Brien v. Wormuth
as 1:2022cv00681
Plaintiff: Rebecca L. O'Brien
Defendant: Christine Wormuth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00676
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Johnson v. Department of Labor (MAG+)
as 2:2022cv00674
Plaintiff: Lonnie Johnson
Defendant: Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Odom et al v. Buckner et al
as 2:2022cv00673
Plaintiff: Joshua Odom, Candace Odom and K. J. O.
Defendant: Nancy Buckner, Marilyn Colson, Vatesha Gibbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00666
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00672
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Smith v. Retirement Systems of Alabama et al(MAG+)
as 2:2022cv00669
Plaintiff: Peter J. Smith
Defendant: Retirement Systems of Alabama and Donald Terry and Associates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. City of Montgomery, AL et al (MAG+)
as 2:2022cv00668
Plaintiff: Peter J. Smith
Defendant: City of Montgomery, AL and City of Montgomery, AL Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tabit-EL v. Lavelle et al (MAG+)
as 2:2022cv00665
Plaintiff: Cheryl A. Tabit-EL and Sui Juris
Defendant: Paul K. Lavelle, Bill Lewis, Duane Dewey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?