US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 4,156
Scott v. Barbour County Alabama et al
as 2:2023cv00709
Plaintiff:
Angelo Scott
Defendant:
Barbour County Alabama and Officer Ellington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
J. v. Montgomery County Board of Education et al
as 2:2023cv00706
Plaintiff:
C.D.J.
Defendant:
Montgomery County Board of Education, Melvin J. Brown, Brian Thornton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00708
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 120711 Americans with Disabilities Act
Knox v. Jackson Hospital and Clinic, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00704
Plaintiff:
Mark Knox
Defendant:
Jackson Hospital and Clinic, Inc. and Medtronic PLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00700
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Goff v. City of Dothan et al
as 1:2023cv00687
Plaintiff:
Jewett Ladon Goff
Defendant:
City of Dothan, Dothan City Commission and Kevin Cowper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00685
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00686
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bush et al v. Alabama Department of Human Resources et al
as 2:2023cv00673
Plaintiff:
Adam Bush, Delsea Creel, L. C. and others
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Human Resources, Nancy Buckner, Dan Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson
as 2:2023cv00676
Plaintiff:
Mr Joseph A Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
