US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,628
Posey v. Walmart
as 2:2024cv00439
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Posey
Defendant:
Walmart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Prichett v. Stanley
as 3:2024cv00409
Plaintiff:
Jonquis Prichett
Defendant:
Justin Stanley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Norrell v. Phenix City Public Transportation
as 3:2024cv00411
Defendant:
Phenix City Public Transportation
Plaintiff:
Larry Joe Norrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bunge-Shumaker v. Dothan Landmarks Foundation, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00406
Plaintiff:
Tabitha Bunge-Shumaker
Defendant:
Dothan Landmarks Foundation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Johnson v. Hoffman (MAG+)
as 3:2024cv00400
Defendant:
Carla Hoffman
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hammond et al v. Strickland et al (MAG+)
as 1:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
Ketavious Javon Hammond and Tavon Hammond
Defendant:
K. Smith and Brad Strickland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gray v. Abbett et al
as 3:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
Connie Michelle Gray
Defendant:
Jimmy Abbett and Tallapoosa County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Henderson v. Amerson et al
as 2:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
Sean Henderson, Jr
Defendant:
Cody Amerson and Brady Amerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Smith v. Bill Franklin, et al
as 2:2024cv00361
Plaintiff:
Hunter Daryl Smith
Defendant:
Bill Franklin Elmore County Sheriff, Tracy Jackson Elmore County Correctional Warden, Josh Tidwell Elmore County Sheriff Deputy/Correctional Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. Terry et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
James Robinson
Defendant:
Alcornelia Terry, John Q. Hamm and Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
