US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Cases 1 - 10 of 21,975
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. Heartland Recreational Vehicles, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00250
Plaintiff:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Defendant:
Heartland Recreational Vehicles, LLC and Norcold, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ross v. Guildford et al
as 2:2024cv00254
Plaintiff:
Rodney Patrick Ross
Defendant:
Jonathan Andrew Guildford, Stacie Irving and Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
Doe v. General Motors, LLC
as 2:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ross v. Guilford et al
as 2:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
Rodney Patrick Ross
Defendant:
Jonathan Andrew Guilford, Stacie Irving and Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
McCrory v. Hamm (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00247
Plaintiff:
Charles McCrory
Defendant:
John Hamm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reese v. Huggins et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
Cedric Anthony Reese
Defendant:
Thomas Huggins and Blake Turman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rainbow USA, Inc. v. PM Crimson, LLC
as 2:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
Rainbow USA, Inc.
Defendant:
PM Crimson, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Parker v. DeJoy
as 1:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Parker
Defendant:
Louis DeJoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
