Reese v. Huggins et al (INMATE 2)
| Cedric Anthony Reese |
| Thomas Huggins and Blake Turman |
| 2:2024cv00248 |
| April 26, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Emily C Marks |
| Kelly F Pate |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE: the undersigned Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that this case be DISMISSED without prejudice. Objections to R&R due by 7/8/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kelly F. Pate on 6/17/2024. (CWL) |
Filing 3
ORDER: it is ORDERED that by May 21, 2024, Plf must file a prison account statement from the inmate account clerk showing the average monthly balance and average monthly deposits in his prison account for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of this Complaint; the Clerk is DIRECTED to provide a copy of this Order to the inmate account clerk at the facility where Plf is detained. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kelly F. Pate on 5/7/2024. (copy mailed to Account Clerk at Covington Co. Jail)(BES)
|
| Filing 2 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by Cedric Anthony Reese. (TPS) |
| Filing 1 Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against Thomas Huggins, Blake Turman, filed by Cedric Anthony Reese.(TPS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
