Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Reese v. Huggins et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
Cedric Anthony Reese
Defendant:
Thomas Huggins and Blake Turman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUGGINS v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv00876
Plaintiff:
THOMAS HUGGINS
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Anderson v. Turman et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00154
Defendant:
Natalie Brown, Mickey Shelton, Thomas Huggins and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Delano Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Capers v. Huggins et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00945
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wayne Capers, Sr.
Defendant:
Thomas Huggins, Lt. Mandy, Mrs. Betty and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Nurses Staff of Covington County Jail et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00834
Defendant:
Betty Long, Thomas Huggins, Nurses Staff of Covington County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Edward Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huggins v. YCI Methanol One, LLC et al
as 4:2019cv03851
Defendant:
YCI Methanol One, LLC and Koch Methanol, LLC
Plaintiff:
Thomas Huggins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Huggins v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2018cv04371
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Thomas Huggins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Huggins v. KMF Ocean Vista, LLC
as 3:2011cv02917
Plaintiff:
Thomas Huggins
Defendant:
KMF Ocean Vista, LLC, Todd A. Brisco & Associates and Todd A. Brisco
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
McCarver v. Huggins(INMATE 2)
as 2:2011cv00162
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Hibbett McCarver
Defendant:
Thomas Huggins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huggins v. Bredesen et al
as 3:2007cv00125
Plaintiff:
Thomas Huggins
Defendant:
Phil Bredesen, Tennessee Department of Corrections and Tennessee Board of Paroles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
