District Court Cases in North Carolina
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,000
JOHNSON v. TOTAL TRANSPORTATION OF MISSISSIPPI, LLC et al
as 1:2026cv01203
Plaintiff:
MAURICE DESHAUN JOHNSON
Defendant:
TOTAL TRANSPORTATION OF MISSISSIPPI, LLC, U.S. XPRESS LEASING, INC., U.S. XPRESS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
KHAN v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
as 1:2026cv01199
Plaintiff:
KAMRAN ASIF KHAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, JOSEPH B. EDLOW, MARKWAYNE MULLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Tubbs et al v. Thales Academy, Inc.
as 5:2026cv00794
Plaintiff:
Nikena Tubbs and C. W.
Defendant:
Thales Academy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
v. Gutierrez Hernandez et al
as 1:2026cv00354
Defendant:
Octavio Gutierrez Hernandez and Robert Alan Delosh, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Auto Negligence
SCOTT v. ROWAN COUNTY
as 1:2026cv01197
Plaintiff:
LARRY SCOTT
Defendant:
ROWAN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
ERIE INSURANCE EXCHANGE v. LG ELECTRONICS U.S.A., INC.
as 1:2026cv01201
Plaintiff:
ERIE INSURANCE EXCHANGE
Defendant:
LG ELECTRONICS U.S.A., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
Santillan v. USA
as 5:2026cv00251
Petitioner:
Martin Vidal Santillan
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00232
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Payton v. USA
as 1:2026cv00353
Petitioner:
Dequan Tyrie Payton
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
MARTINEZ v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2026cv01200
Petitioner:
ALFONSO LEAL MARTINEZ
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
