US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina

Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 23,719
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00233
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
WILSON v. DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC.
as 1:2024cv00236
Plaintiff: ADLAY Y WILSON
Defendant: DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
SELLERS v. THE UNITED STATES
as 1:2024cv00234
Plaintiff: TYQASHIA SELLERS
Defendant: THE UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MILLER v. O.I.C. et al
as 1:2024cv00235
Plaintiff: JOHN FRANK MILLER
Defendant: LT. O.I.C., OFFICER SLONG, JANE DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICKY FRAZIER CONSTRUCTION, LLC v. FARMER & ASSOCIATES, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00228
Plaintiff: RICKY FRAZIER CONSTRUCTION, LLC
Defendant: FARMER & ASSOCIATES, INC., FARMER ASHEBORO NC, LLC and PERSONS SERVICES CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Sizemore v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00229
Plaintiff: Randall Sizemore
Defendant: MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
BAIZE v. USA
as 1:2024cv00232
Petitioner: BARRY DEAN BAIZE
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
WOODBERRY v. MICHAEL et al
as 1:2024cv00231
Plaintiff: MANDRAIL JAMAR WOODBERRY
Defendant: JUDGE MICHAEL, JOHN BANDLE, M. ODOM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00230
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
JUMPER v. ISHEE et al
as 1:2024cv00227
Plaintiff: RICHARD D. JUMPER, JR.
Defendant: TODD ISHEE, PETER BUCHHOLTZ, KENO WHITE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?