US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,246
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ELK PHARMACY, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv01006
Defendant:
BETH PENCE, S. JASON COUCH, ELK PHARMACY, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00986
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00979
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3001 Federal Debt Collection Act
CUTSHALL v. HUMACYTE, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00954
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. CUTSHALL
Defendant:
HEATHER PRICHARD, HUMACYTE, INC., LAURA E. NIKLASON and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00921
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
GIL v. PRESPRO HOMES LLC
as 1:2024cv00912
Defendant:
PRESPRO HOMES LLC
Plaintiff:
MARK GIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
JURYX, LLC v. KULP et al
as 1:2024cv00881
Defendant:
TANDEM LEGAL SOLUTIONS LLC and LAUREN E. KULP
Plaintiff:
JURYX, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836 (b) Civil Action to Protect Trade Secrets
RAMIREZ HINOJOSA v. HEFFRON et al
as 1:2024cv00851
Plaintiff:
CARMEN RAMIREZ HINOJOSA
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER M. HEFFRON and UR M. JADDOU
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
GRISSOM v. FAY SERVICING, LLC
as 1:2024cv00842
Plaintiff:
HAVANNA JANE GRISSOM
Defendant:
FAY SERVICING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101 Bankruptcy
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00829
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
