U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,468
PARKS v. DISMUKES
as 1:2025cv00398
Petitioner:
JORINDAL Q. PARKS
Respondent:
LESLIE DISMUKES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ALLEY v. USA
as 1:2025cv00394
Petitioner:
CHADLEY DEAN ALLEY
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
DAWKINS v. DISMUKES
as 1:2025cv00392
Petitioner:
ERIC DAWKINS
Respondent:
LESLIE DISMUKES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BRADSHAW v. HARDIN et al
as 1:2025cv00389
Plaintiff:
JOSHUAH TAYLOR BRADSHAW
Defendant:
MICHAEL K. HARDIN and K.D. MONROE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRADSHAW v. VIRGIL et al
as 1:2025cv00390
Plaintiff:
JOSHUAH TAYLOR BRADSHAW
Defendant:
RODERICK C. VIRGIL, THOMAS and SHELLY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SATTERFIELD v. CHANDLER et al
as 1:2025cv00384
Plaintiff:
MARCUS ANTONIO SATTERFIELD
Defendant:
CAPTAIN RODNEY CHANDLER and COUNTY COMMISSONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SATTERFIELD v. GIL et al
as 1:2025cv00385
Plaintiff:
MARCUS ANTONIO SATTERFIELD
Defendant:
MANUAL (MANNY) GIL, CAPTAIN MARK MASSEY and DAVID HESS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WATTERSON v. GRAHAM et al
as 1:2025cv00380
Plaintiff:
RANDY A. WATTERSON
Defendant:
LENWOOD GRAHAM, DEAN LOCKLEAR and NCDAC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. RAMSEY et al
as 1:2025cv00381
Plaintiff:
JOHN FRANK MILLER
Defendant:
CHAPLAIN RAMSEY and ALL THE PRISON POLICY MAKERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KERSHAW v. USA
as 1:2025cv00378
Petitioner:
DEAN ARTHUR KERSHAW, JR.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
